Epic Fireworks Blog

Archive for the ‘Firework Innovation’ Category

One of our loyal customers decided to do something a little fancy. He decided that he wanted to make his own catherine wheel using our 1kg machine pressed conic fountains.

He used 5 of our super conic fountains to drive the wheel sending out sparks left, right and centre. As you can see from the video below, it really does start to pick up speed – we think it’s very cool

Click here for another fountain experiment.

This blog is for all you ladies, and maybe for a few of you weird guys out there!

A little while ago we posted a blog about Lady GaGa and her amazing boobies of fire, well here’s a video on how to make your own

All you need is:

• A glue gun
• Sheets of adhesive plastic
• Some wire
• 4 wire rings
• Some sparklers
• Thin sheets of cardboard
• Tape
• Scissors

There is no such thing as a “daft” question when talking fireworks. With over twenty years in the industry, we have probably heard them all. We like to think there isn’t much we at Epic don’t know about the subject, however, we were recently asked if anyone has ever managed to perfect a firework (either a barrage, cake or shell) that accurately creates the “Olympic Rings”. The answer is NO, not yet.

The difficulty is a few fold, firstly as you can see from the picture one of the rings is black, not the best colour to have in a night time firework display.

The colours themselves are easy (although the black would cause a few headaches):
1st we have BLUE… copper compounds + chlorine producer copper acetoarsenite (,Cu3As2O3Cu(C2H3O2)2 = blue copper (I) chloride, CuCl = turquoise blue
2nd GOLD… incandescence of iron (with carbon), charcoal, or lampblack
3rd we have the GREEN… element of choice here is barium compounds + chlorine producer
barium chloride, BaCl+ = bright green, remove the chlorine element for a green apple/yellowish green shade.
4th RED…strontium salts, lithium salts
lithium carbonate, Li2CO3 = red
strontium carbonate, SrCO3 = bright red
And finally, a black that’s shows up at night – answers on a postcard please or via e-mail.

The Chinese are undoubtedly the masters when it comes to creating all things pyro, but when it came to the 2008 Beijing Olympics not one ring was seen.

The main difficulty comes when you look at the design of the rings. 5 intertwined rings, the separate effects known as “petals” would have to be constructed with each petal having a simultaneous burst charge, usually black powder coated rice husks, throwing the “ring” a quite specific distance away to create the illusion of all five rings at the same time. Each ring would also have to be aligned with the other four to complete the finished item with some pretty complex geometry involved. As with a shell it spins while it is reaching its pre- determined burst height, the calculations I expect, would give even Professor Steven Hawking something to think about (hope you enjoyed your epicfireworks if you are reading this Mr Hawking).

Just to give you an idea the lift charge calculation alone is: Y=VyT+0.5GT^2
Y=vertical height, Vy=initial vertical velocity, T=hang time, G=acceleration due to gravity
X=VxT
X=horizontal distance, Vx=initial horizontal velocity, T=hang time
The Pythagorean Theorem – a^2 + b^2 = c^2
a or b = vertical or horizontal velocity, c=resultant initial velocity

We were going to offer prize to anyone who could successfully fire “the Olympic rings” with one fuse being lit. But, I’m sure there would be one bright spark (no pun intended) who would find away round it, our customers being some of the most inventive people around (see our previous blogs on rocket racks etc.).

For now it looks like lasers will be the way ahead, but hopefully in the near future, complex fireworks graphics will be commonplace, the sooner the better.